Home > Return Code > Return Code 12 Reason Code 49

Return Code 12 Reason Code 49

MESSAGE IGD330I ERROR OCCURRED DURING CBRXLCS PROCESSING- NO DEVICE POOLS EXIST TO FULFILL REQUEST FOR TDSI SPECIFICATION IGD306I UNEXPECTED ERROR DURING CBRXLCS PROCESSING RETURN CODE 12 REASON CODE 49 THE MODULE It provides sufficient information so that you can start prioritizing the implementation of new functions and evaluating their applicability in your DFSMS environment. Once I got that done I was able to make it a bit further. Do I need to set a range of tapes to be used solely for encryption and a separate range for unencrypted tapes? http://0pacity.com/return-code/vsam-catalog-return-code-is-8-reason-code-is-igg0cleg-42.html

Ring Associations: Ring Owner:EKMSERV Ring:EKMRING Thanks again for all your help. Problem summary Problem conclusion Temporary fix Comments Info APAR APAR Information APAR numberII13276 Reported component nameV2 LIB INFO ITE Reported component IDINFOV2LIB Reported release001 StatusCLOSED CAN PENoPE HIPERNoHIPER Special AttentionNoSpecatt Submitted It provides you with the information that you need to understand and evaluate the content of this DFSMS release, along with practical implementation hints and tips. Back to top Nic CloustonAdvancedJoined: 01 Feb 2007Posts: 976Topics: 6Location: At Home Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 7:27 am Post subject: BTW - you have made 3 posts each starting a

Things to check: 1) For SCRATCH allocations it is usually a problem with Data Class. Back to top Nic CloustonAdvancedJoined: 01 Feb 2007Posts: 976Topics: 6Location: At Home Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 2:10 am Post subject: and what is your JCL?_________________Utility and Program control cards are Back to top Display posts from previous: All Posts1 Day7 Days2 Weeks1 Month3 Months6 Months1 YearOldest FirstNewest First MVSFORUMS.com Forum Index -> Job Control Language(JCL) All times are GMT - We also obviously need to read older unencrypted tapes.

If some of your drives were the original 3592 non-encryption drives; that might be an issue. Previous by thread: Re: TS3584 and TS1120 encryption Next by thread: Re: Redesigning the Principles of Operation Manual Index(es): Date Thread Flag as inappropriate (AWS) Security UNIX Linux Coding Usenet ArchiveAboutPrivacyImprint Doesn't matter if volume V12345 was originally a non-encrypted tape, then was used for encryption and later was used-again (after going scratch of course) as a non-encrypted tape. On the label it said 3590 and den=828K and letter J.

If you can't resolve the problem using the steps above, please collect the SYSLOG, JOBLOG, software LOGREC entry (logrec ID included in the IGD306I message) and take a dump of the If it is not the correct one, check your ACS routine logic. Kind Regards, Roberto ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html Previous message Just like Virtual-WORM and Replication.

Any help would be greatly appreciated. I am missing something else, then because when I run a very simple job to attempt to encrypt a tape, I get a JCL error as follows: 16.57.46 JOB03624 IRR010I USERID HesabımAramaHaritalarYouTubePlayHaberlerGmailDriveTakvimGoogle+ÇeviriFotoğraflarDaha fazlasıDokümanlarBloggerKişilerHangoutsGoogle'a ait daha da fazla uygulamaOturum açınGizli alanlarGrupları veya mesajları ara Skip to site navigation (Press enter) Tape mount difficulties Roberto Halais Fri, 19 Jan 2007 06:26:25 -0800 Dear Listers: We don't want to encrypt everything going to the TS1120s, but want to, for example, encrypt our backup tapes, but leave our HSM ML2 tapes unencrypted.

I am missing something else, then because when I run a very simple job to attempt to encrypt a tape, I get a JCL error as follows: 16.57.46 JOB03624 IRR010I USERID This book was written for storage professionals and system programmers who have experience with the components of DFSMS. Thanks, Rex -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Russell Witt Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 4:05 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: TS3584 and TS1120 encryption Rex, When I run an SMP/E receive job I get the following message: IGD330I ERROR OCCURRED DURING CBRXLCS PROCESSING- NO DEVICE POOLS TO FULFILL REQUEST FOR THE SPECIFIED RECORDING TECHNOLOG THE FAILING

For instance, if you have upgraded all of your devices to a new model (3590 Model B -> 3590 Model E) and your data class still referenced the old recording technology, http://0pacity.com/return-code/cpic-return-code-017-sap-return-code-731.html To save somebody else the headaches, I had neglected to rescan the tape drives at the controller level in the library after enabling encryption in the drives. I got past the IGD306I error. Is this correct?

We have a 3494 ATL and we inserted the tape as an unlabeled cart type J into the ATL. References: Re: TS3584 and TS1120 encryption From: Russell Witt Re: TS3584 and TS1120 encryption From: Pommier, Rex Prev by Date: Re: Tail of MVS SYSLOG Next by Date: Re: TS3584 and TIA, Rex ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from Check This Out Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may

Now I'm getting an error in the EKM saying I don't have a private key, but RACF says the private key is there. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. With the IGD306I, you might also see: NO DEVICE POOLS EXIST TO FULFILL REQUEST FOR SPECIFIED RECORDING TECHNOLOGY. ( RETURN CODE 12 REASON CODE 66 rc12 rsn66) or NO DEVICE POOLS

Rex -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 5:12 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: TS3584 and TS1120 encryption Russ, Thanks

Verify that the correct Data Class is being selected and that the ISMF definition is correct. . For DFSMS releases below R1F0, verify that you have the fix for APAR OW41005 as it corrects a problem with this ALTER command. . If the above displays are incorrect, check PSP buckets (like 3494DEVICE and 3590DEVICE) for missing maintenance. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format.

Error description There are several variations of this error. Likewise there is no need for two separate ranges of tapes. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN The information contained in this contact form See section below on "Other 3590B to E migration issues:" . 3) For new installs or upgrade of existing drives: - Verify device type is correct in displays resulting from the

Code: QW IGD330I QW IGD306I Back to top Nic CloustonAdvancedJoined: 01 Feb 2007Posts: 976Topics: 6Location: At Home Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 7:23 am Post subject: assuming you have Quickref installed_________________Utility But since all your existing TS1120 drives are already encryption-capable - no problem. If you have just upgraded your drives to a new recording technology, (this is especially important if all of the drives in your library have been upgraded) you may need to To update only the TCDB, you can use IDCAMS: Example: //ALTERVOL JOB ... //STEP1 EXEC PGM=IDCAMS //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=A //SYSIN DD * ALTER VAL0001 - VOLUMEENTRY - SATTR(RDCOMPAT) /* or "ALTER

If it is the one you expect, display the Data Class definition in ISMF and look at the recording technology and/or media type specified. The doc also seemed to indicate that I could use the same physical library and drives to read/write both data formats. So either way (default is SCRATCH then to PRIVATE, or default is PRIVATE), if it is going to end up PRIVATE, the exit needs to supply or verify that the recording Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected.

So I thought maybe my ECART hadn't taken, so I tried changing the JCL to UNIT=JUNK (a non-existent ESOTERIC) and got a completely different error. //STEP1 EXEC PGM=IEBGENER //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* Adding new drives, new port assignments, HW microcode upgrades, general upgrades to the ATL/VTS/Peer to Peer, control units, or LM's in general will require an IODF activate. Do I need to define which tapes will be used for encryption ahead of time and define that into the CBRUXENT exit? United States English English IBM® Site map IBM IBM Support Check here to start a new keyword search.

APAR status Closed as canceled. Bu kitaba önizleme yap » Kullanıcılar ne diyor?-Eleştiri yazınHer zamanki yerlerde hiçbir eleştiri bulamadık.Seçilmiş sayfalarSayfa 47Sayfa 31Sayfa 139Sayfa 126Sayfa 137İçindekilerChapter 1 zOS V112 DFSMS release overview1 Chapter 2 Catalog support7 Chapter My jcl is: //SMPHOLD DD DISP=OLD,RECFM=FB,LRECL=80,BLKSIZE=27920, // DSN=HOLDDATA,VOL=SER=G17901,LABEL=(4,NL), // UNIT=ETAPE, // EXPDT=98000 //SMPPTFIN DD DISP=OLD,RECFM=FB,LRECL=80,BLKSIZE=27920, // DSN=PTF,VOL=SER=G17901,LABEL=(1,NL), // UNIT=ETAPE, // EXPDT=98000 ETAPE point to the ATL 3590 drives. For example, you might see: IGD330I ERROR OCCURRED DURING CBRXLCS PROCESSING- (msgIGD330I) NO DEVICE POOLS EXIST TO FULFILL REQUEST FOR TDSI SPECIFICATION IGD306I UNEXPECTED ERROR DURING CBRXLCS PROCESSING RETURN CODE 12

It appears as though I need to make changes to the CBRUXENT OAM exit to allow use of encrypted tape format. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. From reading several manuals, I thought I would need to set up a new data class specifying EEFMT2 as the data format instead of the EFMT2 format we are currently using.